Numerous media outlets reported McCain's attack on Obama over public financing without noting McCain's loan

Numerous media outlets have reported all or part of Sen. John McCain's statement rebuking Sen. Barack Obama for his decision to forgo public financing in the general election without mentioning that during the primary, McCain signed a loan that could have forced him to remain in the race -- even if he had no chance of winning -- in order to be eligible for public matching funds to repay the loan. Full Story »

Posted by Harv Roth
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, Media, U.S.
Member Tags: right wing press, press bias, big corporate press
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 10+
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 4
Number viewpointsHelp: 4
Opinions as factsHelp: 0
Number stakeholdersHelp: 2
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 2
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Harv Roth - Jun 21, 2008 - 4:57 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Jun 22, 2008 - 11:52 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N1291308116_4139_thumb
4.6
by Vincent Caminiti - Jun. 21, 2008

This is excellent research, facts, quotes and context. It is a compendium of reports supporting its assertion that most corporate media does not perform very well. Clearly most of the reporting on this matter has not included any context in which one can ascertain the rationale, but rather, has opted to foster the argument that Obama broke his pledge, which is patently untrue - the pledge had a caveat, a king-sized caveat. The McCain campaign's shady gaming of the public funds pool ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.2
by Elizabeth White-Nadler - Jun. 22, 2008

My understanding of the role of reviewers with the NewsTrust is to evaluate the coverage of issues in the media. In doing so, we are supposed to suppress our personal feelings about the issues in exchange for evaluating the journalistic merit of the stories we read. This piece is intended to do just that--it makes a contention about the press--that coverage of the public financing issue was not fair--and supports that contention with actual clips from all the major news sources. It ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Jack_dinkmeyer_thumb
4.1
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Jun. 22, 2008

A penetrating, well researched, widely quoting article that rips away the non-stop pro-McCain propragandizizng that has become standard corporate media policy since McCain became the default special interests presidential candidate. What Americans really deserve from the "Liberally biased media" is nothing more than a level planying field. But as Media Matters for America notes, there is: "a pattern of media portrayals of any news, even seemingly negative, as good news for the ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Jun. 23, 2008

The story shows the big corporate press echoing negative republican responses to Obama choosing to forgo public campaign financing funds, and their failure to mention the illegal chicanery used by McCain in dropping out of public financing for the primary and using matching payment funds for loan security. Obama did a smart strategic reversal when presented with good situational data. McCain flop-flipped and managed to also commit a crime punishable by up to five years in prison. ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.8
by Harv Roth - Jun. 21, 2008

The McCain campaign has challenged their opponent to accept public funding. The media has not been reporting this story fairly. Media Matters exposes the deceptive tactics that avoid a little discussed problem McCain has with financing his campaign. Loaded with facts , quotes, and explanations of Federal Election Finance Laws the problem is massive for McCain and his bid for President.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Profajv_thumb
2.2
by Andrew Van Camp - Jun. 24, 2008

It is not clear what McCain’s disagreement with one member of the FEC (politically motivated?) during the primaries, has to do with Obama’s decision to reject public finances for his general election campaign. Avoiding confusion is a primary objective of good journalism.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.5
by Roland F. Hirsch - Jun. 21, 2008

This opinion piece has minimal journalistic merit. It is largely made up of quotes from various newspapers. The author contributed little to the piece. The piece is heavily slanted toward the Democrats, and makes no effort at balance.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 7 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.6
Facts
3.7
Fairness
3.6
Information
3.9
Sourcing
4.1
Style
2.4
Accuracy
3.5
Balance
3.3
Context
3.4
Popularity
3.4
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!