Clean Fusion Power This Decade

(Podcast) Finally achieving fusion energy may be closer than everyone thinks. For decades the dream has been to employ the reaction that powers stars to generate high-volume electricity without the drawbacks of fission reactors---no high-level waste, no weapons application, no risk of meltdown, no use of uranium, and (as with fission) no greenhouse gases.

Ed Moses is director of the National Ignition Facility (NIF) at Lawrence Livermore Labs. Focusing ... Full Story »

Posted by Fabrice Florin
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Fabrice Florin - Jun 21, 2010 - 12:25 PM PDT
Content Type: Podcast
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Fabrice Florin - Jun 21, 2010 - 12:52 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Jon Mitchell
3.6
by Jon Mitchell - Jun. 21, 2010

I was enthralled by the possibilities put forward in this lecture, and I learned a great deal about the potential for fusion energy, but I didn't come away from it feeling like I had a clear picture of when this can happen. Fusion doesn't feel any closer to me now than it did before the talk, though I think Moses and the NIF are doing amazing work.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Fabrice Florin
3.9
by Fabrice Florin - Jun. 21, 2010

Fascinating Long Now seminar about the laser fusion experiment under way at Lawrence Livermore Labs. This ninety-minute podcast features a speech from Ed Moses, director of the National Ignition Facility, about their plans to provide abundant, cheap, clean and renewable energy within the decade. While we won't know if laser fusion is a viable alternative to fossil fuels until they get further along, this talk provides extensive scientific evidence to support Ed's enthusiasm for this technology.

Disclosure: NewsTrust partnered with the Long Now Foundation for an Energy News Hunt in June 2010 -- and invited us to demo our site at the start of this podcast. My rating of this talk will not be counted, due to this conflict of interest.

Disclosure: Fabrice is involved in this story as a co-worker (review not included in overall rating). Help
See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.6

not enough reviews
from 1 review (18% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Information
3.5
Insight
4.0
Style
3.0
Context
4.0
Expertise
3.5
Originality
4.0
Relevance
3.5
Responsibility
3.5
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!