This is a nice piece of digging by the WSJ. Seemed to let McCain off the hook, though this is not really a piece on him. It does point out his contradiction on incentives for nuclear but not for solar and other renewables. Overall, a nice report on Obama's economic approach.

For the WSJ, which usually tilts heavily right, this is a balanced discussion of Obama's economic plans. It is informative, and the language is mostly neutral rather than loaded with subtext. I like the inset of Obama/McCain views on various eonomic aspects, and the language there is also neutral. One weakness is the discussion of "Carter's Second Term." This paragraph doesn't follow clearly from what has gone before and looks like simply an effort to add the McCain view to the ... More »

Actually quite a good story. I would prefer it to trash Obama more since his program is actually self contradictory and mainly political with such things as narrowing the gap between the wealthy and less wealthy - a gap that has not widened except in the press releases of the democrat office holders and the supporting articles in the New York Times.

Good writing by the WSJ. The lower and middle class will benefit from Senator Obama's plan, he is innovative and there are no "trickle down economics". John McCain has stated himself that economics is not his strong suit and reading is believing. I liked the analogy between the two presidential hopefuls. Enlightning article.