Mostly, higher incomes pay capital gains tax

"Are there a few middle-class people who pay the tax? Sure. But on the whole, capital gains taxes are disproportionately paid by higher-income brackets. We find the RNC's claim to be Barely True." Full Story »

Posted by Bill Adair
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Bill Adair - Jun 16, 2008 - 12:05 PM PDT
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Beth Wellington - Jun 16, 2008 - 12:46 PM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fred Gatlin
4.3
by Fred Gatlin - Oct. 1, 2008

A well done exposure of Republican National Committee lie. No wonder they continue to lose.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Ben Ross
4.0
by Ben Ross - Oct. 1, 2008

Interesting breakdown of who pays which kinds of taxes and how much you must earn to be in the capital gains coterie. Informative debunking of GOP drivel.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Bill Adair
5.0
by Bill Adair - Oct. 1, 2008

Disclosure: I'm the editor of PolitiFact

See Full Review » (2 answers)
Norman Rogers
1.0
by Norman Rogers - Oct. 1, 2008

Economic ignorance at work. First of all the top income tax rate is 35%, not 28% and Obama wants to put it back to Clinton value of 39.4%. Then you have to add state taxes. For example in California the top income tax rate is 10.3% which would be added to Obama's 28% and if the taxpayer is in AMT he couldn't deduct the California tax. That would put the capital gains tax at 38.3% for Californians in AMT. Remember if the capital gain is on property held less than a year regular income tax rates apply now. Capital gains taxes are often a tax on inflation. The additional problem with capital gains taxes is that it freezes commerce since no one wants to sell anything if they have to pay a 38% tax. Instead they wait until they die ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Michael Nolan
3.1
by Michael Nolan - Oct. 1, 2008

The article points out that a Republican ad attacking Obama for advocating elimination of the capital gains tax break is based upon faulty assumptions and poor reporting. It relies on somewhat dated (2005) figures and makes some rather sweeping generalizations, but overall the story is fair and informative.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Alan McLemore
4.5
by Alan McLemore - Oct. 1, 2008

This is a very good, well-balanced analysis of the Republican claim that raising the capital-gains tax would "hurt" the middle class. It is well-sourced and uses assumptions generous to the Republican position--and yet demolishes the claim. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jim Hodapp
2.7
by Jim Hodapp - Oct. 1, 2008

Kind of limited, though I appreciate that it doesn't just try and come out and say that new taxes are good. It just tries to disprove a point made by the RNC.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Fairness
3.4
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.3
Context
3.3
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.7
Credibility
2.8
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!