Thoughtful opinion about how to finance an increase in federal R&D spending on energy solutions. The author cites a number of experts and credible sources to establish the low level of U.S. government investment in energy, compared to the space program or the war against cancer. The article highlights science adviser John Holdren's suggestion that a mere two-cent fuel tax could triple our current R&D investment, as an example of how this program could be financed, if Americans can muster the political will. Multiple links provide additional context on this important issue.

Magic. Just spend more on "research" and wonderful things will follow. A good example of simplistic thinking. Research what? Be precise. Dumping more money into the academic sinkhole may well make things worse. It depends.