the IAEA has refused to acknowledge publicly significant evidence brought to its attention by Iran that the documents were fabricated, and has made little, if any, effort to test the authenticity of the intelligence documents or to question officials of the governments holding them, IPS has learned. Full Story »
Posted by Dwight Rousu
To:
Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.
Note:
Raises valid points that are neither confirmed nor denied, as well as more that are confirmed, a good read
Developing a nuke is not just the ability to have enough fisile material, there are many more parts to the puzzle and while I have my own ... More »
But Linzer’s February 2006 story reported only that the Sandia National Laboratories in New Mexico had run computer simulations on the studies of a Shahab-3 reentry ... More »
The failure of the IAEA to do due investigation of charges of forgery of documents that could lead to war are serious charges worth evaluating.
Facts, fact checks, interviews, double checks. Gareth Porter is a very professional journalist. He lets the facts speak for themselves and therefore does a good job of raising questions about the IAEA's credibility since the departure of El Baradei and the supervision of his successor.
Outstanding (and very complex) report; must reading for those wishing to understand this subject area. I would add that the CIA was very well aware the "Niger Yellowcake" documents were forgeries, long before G W Bush & Co used them to take the US into a catatrophic war needlessly. If Mossad planted the forgeries Iran complains about, that fact should be made known to the world.
Retrieving Comments
