One of the best opinion pieces I've read on the Democratic nominating process--and I've read a lot! This is fair and reasoned, pointing out valid problems where they exist all around.

Worth reading in that it gives a succinct summation and perspective from a British view of the Democratic primaries and where we've landed after fifteen months of campaigning. One of many articles and op/eds we shall be seeing this week as the primaries draw to a close, and the postmortems, second-guessings and pronouncements roll out.

A resonably good story that fails to report the problems including length of the campaign, costs of the campaign and many other problems. The last paragraph is baffling. Is the author speaking about the Florida and Michigan primaries or the process problems. If the last paragraph is about the Florida and Michigan primaries, the article is wrong.

Good but seemed like a filler, or general thumbsucker. But good and complete.

A well presented summation of the campaign's endgame as seen from across the pond. An excellent opinion piece by any standard.

This is a good summary and wrap-up of the Democratic primary battle. It was certainly good practice for Mr. Obama, as Mrs. Clinton left no stones unturned. Mr. Obama wisely avoided Water- gate, cattle futures, stolen furniture from the White House, Vince Foster (not a suicide), and the current Peter Paul suite here in California concerning Mrs. Clinton's campaign fraud in her first senate race. Mr. McCain would not have been so kind.