Tom Brokaw's Disturbing Defense of the Media and Iraq

What is most appalling, however, is that it took McClellan's book to produce a debate about this tremendously vital subject at all....[in the] coverage of the fifth anniversary of the start of the Iraq war back in March, the media reviewed every aspect of the war and pointed fingers everywhere, except at the media. There was almost no self-assessment, after five years of war. Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington
Tags Help
Subjects: Media, U.S., Politics, Other
Member Tags: Iraq. Bush. McClellan
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 3
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 1
Number stakeholdersHelp: 10+
Editorial Help

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.7
by Jim Lang - May. 31, 2008

This blog post blasts NBC new and Tom Brokaw in particular for not admitting their failure to dig during the run up to the US invasion of Iraq. It makes its point well but in sources and detail pales in comparison to the excellent McClatchy column to which it provides a link.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.8
by Dwight Rousu - Jun. 1, 2008

Brokaw is an intellectually and morally bankrupt talking head. Mitchell captures the hideously costly failure of NBC to fact check the obvious lies that were fertilized and favored by almost all the neocons and their still captive right wing big corporate press that overwhelmingly beat the drums for war and drummed out any commentators or experts who spoke truth in attacking the lies. Well written and researched.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by Lynn Caporale - Jun. 1, 2008

It is good journalism because it draws attention to a story that is not adequately reported: that a few, but too far too few, reporters challenged the propaganda; in contrast, all around us we have the over-reported and less important version of the story: here's a video of Dana Perino's reaction to Scott McClellan's book.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Ann_wilmer_thumb
4.1
by Ann Wilmer - Jun. 3, 2008

Nukes and Spooks, blogged by McClatchy (formerly Knight-Ridder) journalists who were among the few who noted in print that the emperor was wearing no clothes. A very good read and lots of links for further information.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Steve_thumb
5.0
by Stephen Pizzo - May. 31, 2008

This piece is important, not just because of what it says, but by whom is saying it. It is long overdue for the media -- of which I was once a part -- to look deeply into its own soul and come to grips with its own responsibility for the worst foreign policy decisions since Gulf of Tonkin took us into Vietnam. The media congratulates itself when it exposes the personal and professional failings in the business and political world. Yet it too often explains away its own failings.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Jack_dinkmeyer_thumb
4.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Jun. 4, 2008

An in-depth piece that amply demonstrates the callous after-the-fact justifications of big name TV journalists. The article misses the entire crux of the issue–as are many other pundits who concentrate on the actions of journalists themselves. The guilt originates at the top. The runup to the war, with all its administration pandering justifications, cheerleading, and hollow patriotism–was calculatedly mandated by what some TV journalists have now referred to as extreme pressure ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by Paul Peete - May. 31, 2008

The Brokaw excuses are lambasted as they should have been. The author is direct in his assertions against lemming-style MSM.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by Julia Willebrand - Jun. 1, 2008
See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Beth Wellington - May. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - May. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
by Douglas Hord - May. 31, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.9
by Dan Fejes - Jun. 1, 2008

Fantastic review. Brokaw: "The White House has an unbelievable ability to control the flow of information at any time but especially at a time when they are planning to go to war." If he believed his organization's ability to work effectively was controlled by the White House he should have told his viewers so. Call it state media and be done with it. Mitchell makes that point very effectively.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.4

Good
from 12 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.4
Facts
4.4
Fairness
4.7
Information
4.4
Sourcing
4.3
Style
4.5
Accuracy
4.8
Balance
4.2
Context
4.4
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.3
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!