A well researched piece that covers the topic from a broad range of angles. But it suffers from being too timid in its recommendations and will be destined to be another in a long line of articles from this esteemed publication that skirts around the issues but but never makes any real difference.

A long, but critical read on the War in Iraq. The author, who clearly has vast knowledge about the region, convincingly argues that the surge is stoking tribal and sectarian divisions that will undermine strong, stable Iraqi state.

This six-page article cannot be termed a summary; however, it contains excellent must-read information. It makes a strong point that the surge, so prized by ultra conservatives and their unfavorite candidate McCain, isn't really responsible for the reduction in violence. If anything, "this strategy to reduce violence is not linked to any sustainable plan for building a viable Iraqi state." Even with other factors, the surge cannot succeed in the long run because it was a reaction, ... More »

The article is interesting but overlooks many points. Army retention is above requirements. Doubts about Maliki were erased with his attacks (against American advice) on Shia militias. He mistakes short term retribalization necessary for security for the long term effort of Iraqi unity through fair elections and economic growth (which is currently 5% a year without Saudi help). He also fails to mention that the Basra situation was caused by British policy of "no casualties". All in ... More »

Very informative, and well researched.

Thorough, well-researched story that includes suggestions for the next phase of the Iraq war. Some speculation may be unjustified as to the consequences of various policies, but the speculation is largely identified as such.