Good Billions After Bad

As the Bush administration waned, the Treasury shoveled more than a quarter of a trillion dollars in tarp funds into the financial system—without restrictions, accountability, or even common sense. The authors reveal how much of it ended up in the wrong hands, doing the opposite of what was needed. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Sep 11, 2009 - 10:58 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Sep 11, 2009 - 10:58 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
P1000885-2_thumb
3.5
by Patricia L'Herrou - Sep. 11, 2009

i can not tell whether or not the story is fair. it documents how some banks who received tarp funds had very consumer-unfriendly tactics, but there are no named sources for much of what the writers' seem to assume. i'd like to hear from current treasury and other economists who are knowledgeable to explain whether or not the implications are accurate : that much of the tarp money was squandered, that is, hasn't helped the economy recover, and simply helped banks remain ... More »

banks had already run amok , leading to the crisis. it may be a long time before it's possible to know how much or little the gov't's plans and ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
4.3
by Derek Hawkins - Sep. 11, 2009

Last October, Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, putting $700 billion into the hands of the Treasury Department to bail out the nation’s ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.3
by Kaizar Campwala - Sep. 11, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Jcw_-_black_shirt_at_51_-_laughing_thumb
5.0
by JOHN CARL WILLIS - Sep. 12, 2009

STOP THE TRAIN! I NEED TO GET OFF!

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 4 reviews (57% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.3
Sourcing
3.5
Style
4.0
Context
4.5
Depth
4.5
Enterprise
4.5
Relevance
4.5
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.5
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!