Why the Obama-Clinton speculation is nuts

The Politico by John F. Harris, Jonathan Martin | May. 9, 2008 (Opinion)

The Clinton veepstakes is an ideal subject for pontificating because so few people have any hard information to know what they are talking about. That makes it easy to bluster on both sides of the question with equal conviction.

That is exactly what Politico has done. Below are five reasons the speculation about her running for vice president is nuts. Here's a link to five other reasons it may not be. Full Story »

Posted by Chris Finnie

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, U.S.
Topics: Presidential Election 2008, Democratic Nomination, Obama Administration, Hillary Clinton, Democratic Party
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Chris Finnie - May 9, 2008 - 3:18 PM PDT
Reviewed by: Chris Finnie (review), Fabrice Florin (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Like | | | Comments

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.5
 by Chris Finnie - May. 9, 2008

Ah, but pontificating and speculating are such fun. And everybody else is doing it. At least these two do it with tongue firmly in cheek and have some fun with it. Along the way, they make some good points and arguments.

Chris posted this story.
See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
 by Fabrice Florin - May. 10, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.4

not enough reviews
from 2 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
4.6
Facts
3.0
Fairness
5.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
4.0
Style
5.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
5.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
3.5
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!