Supreme Court justices question campaign finance law

The US Supreme Court appears poised to pare back campaign finance reform measures that sharply restrict corporate expenditures during federal campaigns.

At issue in a special hearing Wednesday was whether the court should strike down two legal precedents that bar corporations from spending their general treasury funds on political speech during campaign season. Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Christian Science Monitor
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Politics, World, Media
Topics: U.S. Supreme Court, Campaign Finance, Freedom of Speech
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Christian Science Monitor - Sep 9, 2009 - 11:14 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Sep 9, 2009 - 11:14 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.6
by Jim Lang - Sep. 11, 2009

This is a well written, accurate, reasonably complete and dispassionate piece of journalism.

Allowing corporate money to flow into the election process would be a mistake. In this case, as in many others, the "constitutional" argument is ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.4
by Dwight Rousu - Sep. 10, 2009

Richey provides a dispassionate but largely accurate presentation of the case, including statements by significant actors.

Corporations are controlled by the very rich, and allowing corporations to spend freely to elect officials would be a giant step in destroying democracy.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.6
by Tanya J. Maurer - Sep. 15, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)
N1812091_2834_thumb
3.5
by Derek Hawkins - Sep. 9, 2009
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.7
by Jeff South - Sep. 10, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Elton Cooper - Sep. 13, 2009

Yes i think it is quality journalism. Because it covers a very important issue.

The money that is used for political manipulation of public opinion is the same as money donated to a political party. It should be divulged who ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.5

Good
from 6 reviews (54% confidence)
Quality
4.5
Facts
4.2
Fairness
4.8
Sourcing
4.6
Style
5.0
Context
4.7
Depth
4.3
Enterprise
3.7
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.1
Recommendation
4.8
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Campaign-spending case will be a big test for Chief Justice Roberts

    The full impact of what the U.S. Supreme Court could do in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission has only begun to receive the attention it deserves. Will the court ...
    Posted by Dwight Rousu
    4.4