Supreme Court Eyes Decades of Campaign Finance Laws

The Supreme Court on Tuesday will hear arguments in a case that could reverse major gains made in recent decades to reduce the influence of corporate money on federal elections. At first blush, Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission appears to Full Story »

Posted by Derek Hawkins - via Washington Independent
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, U.S., Media
Member Tags: slot 1, slot 3, campaign finance reform, citizens united v. federal elections commission, Supreme Court
Stats Help
# Tweets: 2 (as of 2009-09-08)
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Washington Independent - Sep 8, 2009 - 4:06 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Derek Hawkins - Sep 9, 2009 - 7:53 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

N1812091_2834_thumb
3.8
by Derek Hawkins - Sep. 9, 2009

It's not hard to tell how the Independent feels about the case, but that doesn't hurt the quality of the story for me. Good sourcing, background, and plenty of space given to explain Citizens United's argument.

If a majority of the court agrees to reverse those precedents, experts say the court could open federal campaigns to a flood of corporate funding, radically altering ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
P1000885-2_thumb
3.9
by Patricia L'Herrou - Sep. 9, 2009

the article points out how vital this case and the decision made can be to our election process, particularly based upon how it has come about. what isn't mentioned is the early case which determined that corporations have the same rights as individuals which sets up this issue and others..

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.6
by Dwight Rousu - Sep. 10, 2009

Eviatar concisely captures the critical issues and history of the case.

Fascism involves the conjoining of government and corporations. If justice Roberts has his activist judge way, he will have firmly put the footing ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.7
by Kaizar Campwala - Sep. 9, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Sep. 9, 2009
See Full Review » (3 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Tanya J. Maurer - Sep. 15, 2009

Thom Hartmann provides the history of Supreme Court "personhood" for corporations; the judges did not decide such personhood in their decision on ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
N25520226_7749_thumb
3.6
by Ryan Brosmer - Sep. 9, 2009

I think this is good journalism in that it presents the facts in a way that is fairly easy to understand without much prior information on the subject. It lays out the facts in a very clear way. There is a lot of context provided that helps make the story feel relevant. If there had just been a bunch of facts crammed into an inverted pyramid style it would be too dense, but instead there is some sense of a narrative, just with the characters and plots revolving on Supreme Court ... More »

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.9
by Patrick McGuire - Sep. 10, 2009

The article has been written with a lot of forethought with the intention of trying to be impartial.

It is the citizen who is responsible for the political process. PAC's, groups and corporations are not citizens and have no constitutional rights to ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.9

Good
from 8 reviews (63% confidence)
Quality
3.9
Facts
4.2
Fairness
3.9
Information
5.0
Insight
3.0
Sourcing
3.7
Style
4.2
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.5
Depth
3.6
Enterprise
3.7
Expertise
3.0
Originality
3.0
Relevance
4.7
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
3.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.9
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
4.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission - ScotusWiki (Pending)

    Posted by Derek Hawkins
  • Campaign-spending case will be a big test for Chief Justice Roberts

    The full impact of what the U.S. Supreme Court could do in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission has only begun to receive the attention it deserves. Will the court ...
    Posted by Dwight Rousu
    4.4