The technology that will save humanity

The solar energy you haven't heard of is the one best suited to generate clean electricity for generations to come.

... after speaking with energy experts and seeing countless presentations on all forms of clean power, I believe the one technology closest to being a silver bullet for global warming is the other solar power: solar thermal electric, which concentrates the sun's rays to heat a fluid that drives an electric generator. It is the best source of clean energy to replace coal and sustain economic development. I bet that it will deliver more power every year this ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Member Tags: concentrated solar energy, thermal, CSP-PV, Solar Island
Stats Help
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 4
Number viewpointsHelp: 1
Opinions as factsHelp: 1
Derogatory wordsHelp: 2
Complimentary wordsHelp: 4
Editorial Help

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.6
by Rory O'Connor - Apr. 15, 2008

Another story on a 'new' way of using solar power--which actually turns out to be one of the "oldest forms of energy used by humans" -- sunlight concentrated by mirrors.The author says "I believe it will be the most important form of carbon-free power in the 21st century. That's because it's the only form of clean electricity that can meet all the demanding requirements of this century." But the story would have been improved if he had some other voices in it telling us what THEY think as well!

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.7
by Beth Jones - Apr. 21, 2008

I don't appreciate the sensationalistic title, for the rest of the fabulous species trying to inhabit their natural niches on this planet are much more worthy of saving than selfish, destructive humanity. But I grasp the sad need for it in today's "shallow is good" media circus. I thought the article offered a very good, factual overview of CSP technology and its feasibility -- now to see if something this common-sensical can make any headway among America's petroleum-soaked, ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Mindy_avatar_photo_-_radioteocelot-shirt_thumb
4.4
by Mindy Phypers - Apr. 15, 2008

contains a lot of good accurate information. Clearly understandable.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.4
by Dennis A. Abbott - Apr. 14, 2008

"If we are smart, the United States can be the economic leader here. We can accelerate the deployment of a technology that may be critical to saving humanity from a ruined climate." I have little to add to Beth's review, except that I expected this old technology to be old hat and it wasn't. Romm made the subject interesting.

(comment refers to full article) More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Mike LaBonte - Apr. 15, 2008

Romm is an energy expert, and he provides quite a bit of information. He is the source for some claims in this opinion piece, but does include other sources too. Evidence is given for much but not all of the story. Slightly political.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.4
by Terry Mazanec - Apr. 14, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.2
by David Woolley - Apr. 14, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Apr. 14, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.9
by Beth Wellington - Apr. 14, 2008

This article is not as detailed as others I've seen but it does bring the topic of concentrated solar power, which concentrates and stores the sun's heat, to a general readership and adds informaiton on the history of its development. The author writes, "So what do we need to do to ramp up CSP? Interestingly, most CSP executives don't talk much about the need for government R&D. They mostly need policies aimed at creating initial market demand that would help bring down costs quickly ... More »

See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Angyl Bender - Apr. 15, 2008
See Full Review » (4 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.3
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 14, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
1.8
by Kevin Reed - Apr. 16, 2008

Solar power is most definitely the energy source that can save the planet. It is of course ridiculous and short sighted to imagine the thermal version of CSP (Concentrating Solar Power) as a “be all” end all energy source that can save the world. The true conversion from a centralized fossil fuel economy to a distributed solar economy will occur as a result of Space-Based Solar Power combined with many forms of terrestrial solar power. Historically, any major conversion from one ... More »

In the 1860s and 1870s, Augustin Mouchot built the first dish-shaped reflector that ran a heat engine, and he used solar thermal to heat a boiler that ran an ice maker. His ... More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.1
by Casey Brumbach - Apr. 16, 2008

Romm is very credited on the subject of renewable energy as indicated by his credentials and background (see bottom of article). He organizes his argument in an easy to follow manner so the reader if having no knowlege on the topic isn't caught up in concepts beyond their understanding. Romm's article is very bias and offers no arguments from the other side however, his article is more an offering of a solution and a call to action.

That means Congress and the president must renew the 30 percent solar energy investment tax credit through 2016. After all, it’s the least they can do. From 2002 to ... More »

See Full Review » (14 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.2
by Krystal Bick - Apr. 15, 2008

While I understand the point the journalist is trying to make, I feel as if he gives a very one-sided argument. He points out our shortcomings as a fast-growing population and our wasteful habits, but fails to detail how to execute it.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Bobbie Balazo - Apr. 15, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.9
by sujata srinivasiyengar - Apr. 15, 2008

when I read the story, i felt it was too one-sided, focussing on the good points of CSP. the disadvantages were not not mentioned. Also, figures regarding proportion of different energy sources in use were not given.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.0
by Monica Casanueva - Apr. 15, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.0
by Scott Oxarart - Apr. 15, 2008

I believe this writer has done his homework. He gave solid background into the history of solar electric thermal, but it's hard to trust his first-person style. He sounds knowledgeable. He mentions that he has spoken with energy experts and saw "countless presentations on all forms of clean power," that doesn't tell me much. He doesn't mention names or the context of the discussion. I guess it's not bad for this type of non-formal presentation, but it would be nice to google a name ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.7
by Steve Walser - Apr. 14, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Eric Sootin - Apr. 15, 2008
See Full Review » (5 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.5

Good
from 20 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.5
Facts
3.8
Fairness
3.2
Information
4.1
Sourcing
2.6
Style
3.3
Accuracy
4.7
Balance
2.3
Context
3.4
Popularity
3.5
Recommendation
3.6
Credibility
3.4
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
4.4
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »