George Will is wrong about Afghanistan

(Blog Post) The problem in Afghanistan is not that a counterinsurgency strategy has failed, but that is hasn't really ever been tried. There are risks with either strategy, be it reinforcement or withdrawal, but I'd like to hear from the critics why their alternative is better in light of its likely implications, which to me seem pretty awful. Given how bad things would likely get in Afghanistan if we adopted Will's prescriptions, shouldn't we at least give ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Google Blogsearch (World)
Tags Help
Subjects: World, U.S.
Editorial Help
Posted by: via Google Blogsearch - Sep 1, 2009 - 6:44 PM PDT
Content Type: Blog Post
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Sep 2, 2009 - 8:56 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Sep. 2, 2009
See Full Review » (10 answers)
Dscf1547_thumb
3.2
by Manfred Ostrowski - Sep. 3, 2009

Written as a response to George Will, this can hardly be seen as offering a promising strategy to defeat Afghan insurgents which, quite uncritically, are equated with the threat of "international terrorism", and Christian Brose does not even pretend that the interests and wishes of Afghans would matter in the continuing U.S. struggle to gain control. The author fails to address George Will's main points, so his contribution is not convincing.

I think there is still a certain pressure for the U.S. to "win" this war in Afghanistan in order to avoid criticism at home. I am sure many ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.8
by James Canning - Sep. 2, 2009

Christian Brose, and George Will, fail to consider the question of why the effort to bring stability to Afghanistan should be in the hands of the US, when there are other countries in the immediate area far better able to deal with the situation in Afghanistan. The basic assumption of both writers is that the US is the country that needs to be calling the shots, when this demonstrably is untrue.

The US is squandering trillions of dollars on unnecessary military adventures in Iraq and Afghanistan, and this idiocy is undermining the strength ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
N585450818_560_thumb
3.5
by Greg Lygon - Sep. 3, 2009

It is fascinating to find a Conservative Voice (Will's) with an opinion of his own. Agree or disagree, Will has an opinion.

See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 4 reviews (39% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Information
2.8
Insight
3.0
Style
3.5
Context
3.0
Expertise
3.0
Originality
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Time for the U.S. to Get Out of Afghanistan

    U.S. strategy -- protecting the population -- is increasingly troop-intensive while Americans are increasingly impatient about "deteriorating" (says Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman ...
    via Fair Spin
    3.6