We're pumping out CO2 to the point of no return. It's time to alter course

Scientists now say peak temperatures will not fall back. Join me in taking the 10:10 pledge – it?s the best shot we?ve got left Until a few months ago, government targets for cutting greenhouse gases at least had the virtue of being wrong. They were the wrong targets, by the wrong dates, and they bore no relationship to the stated aim of preventing more than 2C of global warming. But they used a methodology that even their sternest critics (myself ... Full Story »

Posted by Subramanya Sastry - via AllTop
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 10 (as of 2009-09-01)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Subramanya Sastry - Sep 1, 2009 - 4:13 AM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Subramanya Sastry - Sep 1, 2009 - 7:55 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
N718702225_6552_thumb
3.0
by Barry Grossheim - Sep. 1, 2009

Important information but not much fun to read unless perhaps you are a scientist.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
P9110066_thumb
1.8
by Patricia Blochowiak - Sep. 5, 2009

This is so poorly written that it's not useful, even though the concept of each of us pledging to decrease our carbon footprint by 10% [OR MORE] is a good idea.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.8
by Dwight Rousu - Sep. 2, 2009

The topic is arguably more important than any other. Monbiot brings in information of new studies and a new action initiative in Britain.

governments’ hopes about the trajectory of temperature change are ill-founded. More »

See Full Review » (15 answers)
Mindy_avatar_photo_-_radioteocelot-shirt_thumb
3.8
by Mindy Phypers - Sep. 2, 2009

This is an important topic but the facts and reasoning leading to the authors conclusion are not well presented.

The 10 10 pledge (a pledge to reduce 10% of ones carbon footprint by 2010) is very important but this article is not one that I will forward to ... More »

See Full Review » (19 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.3
by Tanya J. Maurer - Sep. 9, 2009
See Full Review » (11 answers)
N565026988_7187_thumb
1.9
by Geoff Fischer - Sep. 3, 2009

No. Bias. Inaccurate.

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
5.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
3.0
Insight
3.6
Style
2.7
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.2
Depth
3.0
Enterprise
4.0
Expertise
3.5
Originality
3.8
Relevance
4.5
Transparency
4.0
Responsibility
4.0
Popularity
3.7
Recommendation
3.2
Credibility
3.7
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!