Slimes At The Times

The New York Times launches its long-awaited smear of John McCain today, and the most impressive aspect of the smear is just how baseless it is. They basically emulate Page Six at the Post, but add in a rehash of a well-known scandal from twenty years ago to pad it out and make it look more impressive. In the end, they present absolutely no evidence of wrongdoing -- only innuendo denied by all of the principals: Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Feb 21, 2008 - 9:21 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
P9110066_thumb
1.1
by Patricia Blochowiak - Feb. 22, 2008

Can't even tell the difference between 8 years and 20 years.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.0
by Fabrice Florin - Feb. 21, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Feb. 21, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
4.8
by Roland F. Hirsch - Feb. 21, 2008

The author presents an accurate summary of the New York Times' latest debacle. Pinchgate unraveled even faster than Rathergate and this article provides sufficient information for anyone interested in how it happened.

See Full Review » (12 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.0

Average
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
3.0
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
2.5
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
2.5
Context
3.0
Popularity
2.9
Recommendation
2.8
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!