College Paper Vows To Fight a Takeover by Gannett

Media companies find college newspapers attractive properties for several reasons: operating costs are low because student labor is inexpensive, sometimes even free. Advertising is on the rise. And perhaps most important, the newspapers are read -- frequently -- by a young audience with relatively deep pockets. Full Story »

Posted by Tish Grier
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Tish Grier - Feb 18, 2008 - 10:09 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Feb. 18, 2008

Interesting story, but doesn't really show that there is an immanent threat to college papers from big media. This piece main focuses on the value in these companies doing so.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
N628474479_7734_thumb
4.6
by Joel Kulenkamp - Feb. 18, 2008

Just what is the next thing corporations will get their hot little hands on?

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
2.3
by Marty Heyman - Feb. 18, 2008

Not one mention of media consolidation. Not one mention of privatization of public assets (this is an asset of a public University). Weak support for the paper as educational asset. It's all about advertising and reach and commercialization. And, the elephant in the story, it's all about the administration selling off public assets for "funding". The NY Times Corp. is all for Media Consolidation and commercialization of the press, apparently..

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Tish Grier - Feb. 18, 2008
See Full Review » (12 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
2.7
by Jim Lang - Feb. 18, 2008
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Ben Shute - Feb. 18, 2008

Marty Heyman's review raises important issues not addressed in the story. For interesting contrast, see the story headlined "First on the Scene, Again, Is the College Newspaper" in the February 18 NY Times.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 6 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
3.1
Facts
3.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.5
Sourcing
3.7
Style
3.3
Accuracy
3.5
Balance
3.0
Context
2.7
Popularity
3.8
Recommendation
3.5
Credibility
4.5
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
1.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help