Hacking Michigan

National Review by Jim Geraghty | Jan. 14, 2008 (News Analysis)
Donkeys in the elephant cage.

Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas called for Michigan Democrats to vote for Mitt Romney. Reaction to the post ran the gamut: from those who incredulously objected to "tell[ing] Democratic voters in Michigan to keep the candidacy of a photogenic white guy with lots of money (and the ability to tap corporate interests for more) alive," to those who felt other GOP candidates were more deserving of their faux support, to those who objected on principle to ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala

More Info

Tags Help
Subjects: Politics
Topics: Republican Nomination, Democratic Nomination, Republican Party, Democratic Party
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jan 14, 2008 - 10:00 AM PST
Reviewed by: Kaizar Campwala (review), Fabrice Florin (review), Dwight Rousu (review)
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Like | | | Comments

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
3.4
 by Dwight Rousu - Jan. 15, 2008

Horse race and tactics. Issues forgotten. It would be so hard for me to find anybody worthy or worst in the elephant cage that I think I would visit the donkey manger. One poll strangely suggests crossover dems would vote for McCain as a favorite. That suggests that going to the dems and voting -uncommitted- would still help Romney on the elephant side, and could give Michigan more swing vote power on the donkey side if they get their asses seated.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
 by Kaizar Campwala - Jan. 14, 2008
Kaizar posted this story.
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.0
 by Fabrice Florin - Jan. 14, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

Sort by: Oldest | Newest Hide All Replies
NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.3

Average
from 3 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
3.3
Facts
4.0
Fairness
3.0
Information
4.0
Sourcing
3.0
Style
3.0
Accuracy
3.0
Balance
3.0
Context
3.0
Popularity
3.1
Recommendation
3.3
Credibility
3.0
# Reviews
1.5
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!