New Hampshire Will Be Key Battle In GOP Civil War

As the pared-down field of presidential candidates returns to battle today in preparation for next Tuesday's primary, the GOP faces the prospect of two struggles: one, an intra-party conflict to determine who is going to be the Wall Street/national defense establishment candidate; and, two, a civil war in which the winner of the first conflict takes on Mike Huckabee, the Iowa victor who is leading a right-populist/evangelical insurgency. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Subjects: Politics, U.S.
Topics: Republican Nomination, Presidential Election 2008, Republican Party
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Jan 5, 2008 - 10:25 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by Rory O'Connor - Jan. 5, 2008

A fairly pedestrian overview/analysis of the current state of the GOP presidential race.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.2
by Marty Heyman - Jan. 5, 2008

As analysis goes, it focuses on the mainstream media's candidate lists and fails to mention or analyze the threat to the GOP and the Democrats of Ron Paul's cash-generation capability if not his showing in Iowa. Giuliani is also essentially dismissed without comment why.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Jan. 5, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.0
by Fabrice Florin - Jan. 5, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
P9110066_thumb
3.6
by Patricia Blochowiak - Jan. 7, 2008
See Full Review » (12 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by David Dresser - Jan. 5, 2008

This is a good big picture analysis by an acknowledged reporter. He calls things as they are.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.1
by Roland F. Hirsch - Jan. 5, 2008

This is a poorly written opinion piece that manages to include all the usual cliches, but misses most of the facts. The author is uninformed about recent history. He whites out the violent conflict in the Republican Party in 1976, more bitter than any the Democrats have had over the last 35 years. And anyone who calls the Republicans the party of "segregationists" is nonsensical and cannot be taken seriously. The rest of the piece is equally distorted by the author's prejudices and ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.4

Average
from 7 reviews (confidence not calculated)
Quality
3.4
Facts
2.7
Fairness
3.0
Information
3.4
Sourcing
3.4
Style
2.7
Accuracy
2.7
Balance
2.0
Context
2.8
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.0
Credibility
3.3
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
1.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!