They Report, They Decide?

Should Big Media decide for the rest of us who is -- and more importantly who is not -- a viable candidate for president Full Story »

Posted by Rory O'Connor
Tags Help
Subjects: Media, Politics
Member Tags: Media coverage
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 3
Anonymous sourcesHelp: 0
Number viewpointsHelp: 3
Stakeholders quotedHelp: 3
Editorial Help

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Member_photo_thumb
4.8
by Seabury Lyon - Jan. 3, 2008

The importance of the "YOU report -WE decide" concept can hardly be overstated and is hugely under-appreciated. Take a break and try this instructive thought experiment: Imagine how different our election process would look if for the first 3-4 months ideas and supporting arguments were grouped by subject and presented for evaluation with no attribution, a la carte, sort of like we’d like our cable choices to be. Effects of money, smears and spinning on voter deliberations would ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Jim Filby - Jan. 4, 2008

The efforts of the blogsphere will be looked on in 20 years as the only rein we have on big business and big media. The ability of an individual to call to account for the actions of those in the 4th estate can not be underestimated, we just need a larger megaphone to share the news. I think the benefits of the 1st amendment that professional journalists have extended (to cover for protection of sources) has a reciprocal responsibility to report the events or issues of the day ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Julia Willebrand - Jan. 6, 2008

Provides some good evidence for "thought control" being exercised by media bigs. Despite the fact that a majority of the public is anti-war, anti-war candidates are now excluded from the debates. If no voices for peace and Iraq withdrawal are heard, will the public think there is something wrong with their "thinking"?

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.5
by Rory O'Connor - Jan. 3, 2008
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Member_photo_thumb
4.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Jan. 4, 2008
See Full Review » (11 answers)
P9110066_thumb
4.0
by Patricia Blochowiak - Jan. 7, 2008
See Full Review » (12 answers)
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
3.5
by Fabrice Florin - Jan. 3, 2008
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Francis Scalzi - Jan. 3, 2008

The truth as presented in this excellent article, one of many by Rory Oconnor, seriously hurts (all of us), as it should, but the major media are not interested - - because, you see, Oconnor is an Internet blogger, not a REAL journalist. The big story is in the newspapers and on TV , not the Internet, so Oconnor can be ignored. Right ?

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.5
by Roland F. Hirsch - Jan. 6, 2008

This opinion piece at first convinced me it was by the prolific Scott Ott writing under another name. But it is not up to his standards. Beyond that it is nio more than a screed on behalf of Ron Paul, presumably by one of his isolationist supporters. In fact the media are very diverse, in the case of the two networks in question, Fox right of center and ABC equally left of center in all research studies. But how about the "debates" moderated by the likes of far-left figures such as ... More »

See Full Review » (10 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 9 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
3.0
Fairness
4.0
Information
4.1
Sourcing
4.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
2.3
Context
4.0
Popularity
4.0
Recommendation
4.1
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
4.5
# Views
3.6
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!