Faith and Politics: Rules of the Game

Those who base their political values on their religion have to translate faith statements into value statements that non-believers can evaluate and debate in rational terms. That's what Dr. King did. When he preached that we are all woven together in a single garment of destiny, no doubt he had theological ideas in mind. But the concept itself is one that any atheist can think about, interpret, and debate in purely secular terms. So Dr. King never imposed ... Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Stats Help
Number sourcesHelp: 1
Number viewpointsHelp: 2
Opinions as factsHelp: 5
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Dec 24, 2007 - 12:23 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
2.9
by Fabrice Florin - Dec. 25, 2007

A reasonable opinion piece about the role religion plays in politics. I applaud the author's attempt to draw a line between appropriate and inappropriate uses of faith in the political arena. Though I worry about statements like "it's not worth spending a whole lot of effort worrying about [people who would impose their religion on us] ... because there aren't that many of them and they just aren't very powerful." As much as I wish this were true, I'm afraid this statement doesn't ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.5
by Jack Powers - Dec. 24, 2007

Nice statement of how religion could influence politics in a fair and constructive way.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.4
by Brian Clarke - Dec. 24, 2007

An important subject covered in a subjective manner with an obvious agenda to justify the continued presence of religion in politics. An apology for bacwardness.

Even if we wanted to keep the two absolutely separate, we’d be fighting a losing battle. Religion has always been deeply embedded in U.S. politics, for better and for ... More »

See Full Review » (8 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.5
by Kaizar Campwala - Dec. 24, 2007
See Full Review » (1 answer)
Silhouette_sml
3.4
by James Hammond - Dec. 25, 2007

A good article. presents very lucid arguments, not so much for secularism, but at least discussion, free speech and democracy.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Tony Olsen - Dec. 26, 2007

Unfortunately, too many athiests try to define democracy as debates and laws void of religion. Let the people decide. Let the athiest and faithful cast their votes together, without denying either the right to do so. That's democracy. Democracy means that the people decide. If the people decide to encorporate a religious principle, such as "Love thy Neighbor", then that's their right. If they decide to define marraige as between a man and a woman, and the people's vote sustain it, ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

3.2

Average
from 6 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
3.2
Facts
3.5
Fairness
3.4
Information
3.4
Sourcing
3.0
Style
4.0
Accuracy
5.0
Balance
4.0
Context
3.2
Popularity
3.2
Recommendation
3.8
Credibility
2.8
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
1.8
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help