Politico's Mike Allen, the Man the White House Wakes Up To

Politico wants to “drive the conversation” in the new-media landscape of the 21st. It wants to “win” every news cycle by being first with a morsel of information, whether or not the morsel proves relevant, or even correct, in the long run — and whether the long run proves to be measured in days, hours or minutes. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala - via Jack Shafer, Dan Kennedy, Jim Romanesko, Jay Rosen, Nieman Journalism Lab, New York Times (Most Emailed), Real Clear Politics, Columbia Journalism Review, Memeorandum, Jeppe Kabell (t), Kristi Hancock (t), Peter Avalos (t), Joey Baker (t), Patrick McDermott (t), Jeremy Caplan (t), Matthew Nadler (t), Fabrice Florin (t), Lynnette Fusilier (t), Salvador Sala (t), Rachel Fus (t), Kaizar Campwala (t), Megan Taylor (t), miker1717 (t), Wil Kristin (t), Josh_Young (t), barbara trummpinski-roberts (t), Donica Mensing (t), Malorie Jae Lucich (t), Rachel Fus (f), Shams Kazi (f), Mark Pegrum (f), Jeremy Caplan (f), Dave Palmer (f), Fabrice Florin (f)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 3 (as of 2010-04-23)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Apr 21, 2010 - 6:03 AM PDT
Reviewed by: Dan Kennedy (review)
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Apr 21, 2010 - 8:24 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Dan Kennedy
4.6
by Dan Kennedy - Apr. 24, 2010

Through dogged reporting, examples and quotes from the principals themselves, Leibovich shows Mike Allen and his colleagues at Politico to be a malign force on Washington, encouraging political journalism that is superficial, insidery, and deeply biased toward power and the status quo.

I worked with Leibovich at the Boston Phoenix in the early 1990s. I like him and respect him. He is not a personal friend, and thus I see no problem with my reviewing his work. But in the interest of full disclosure, there you have it.

See Full Review » (13 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.6

not enough reviews
from 1 review (19% confidence)
Quality
4.5
Facts
5.0
Fairness
4.0
Sourcing
5.0
Style
5.0
Context
4.0
Depth
5.0
Enterprise
4.0
Relevance
5.0
Popularity
4.8
Recommendation
5.0
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
1.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!