Thomas Jefferson Wouldn't Think Much of Modern Journalism. Blogging - That's Another Story...

Modern journalism is not only different from what Jefferson intended, it is almost completely the opposite in three fundamental ways: the role of the press, the voices that matter, and the importance of opinions. Full Story »

Posted by Kaizar Campwala
Tags Help
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Kaizar Campwala - Nov 21, 2007 - 9:06 AM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Fabportrait_smallsquare_180x180_thumb
2.5
by Fabrice Florin - Nov. 21, 2007
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
3.0
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 21, 2007
See Full Review » (2 answers)
Silhouette_sml
1.3
by John Orvis - Nov. 21, 2007

The title may make some sense to readers -- albeit for different reasons. But it certainly doesn't make any sense to distinguish between public (PBS), and corporate media -- as the author does. They're really both the same types of entities if you want to look at where they get their funding and the types of people that watch them. The title belies the author's true argument that corporate media is better than government funded media (again, hardly any distinction to a careful ... More »

See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.7
by Oskar Lissheim-Boethius - Nov. 21, 2007

He's comparing NPR with corporate-controlled purely-for-profit consolidated media corporations like Murdoch's infamous News corp? I stopped reading right there.

See Full Review » (7 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

2.1

Poor
from 4 reviews (40% confidence)
Quality
2.0
Fairness
2.0
Information
3.0
Sourcing
2.0
Context
2.0
Popularity
2.3
Recommendation
2.5
Credibility
2.3
# Reviews
2.0
# Views
2.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!