False ‘Death Panel’ Rumor Has Some Familiar Roots

The stubborn yet false rumor that President Obama’s health care proposals would create government-sponsored “death panels” to decide which patients were worthy of living seemed to arise from nowhere in recent weeks. Full Story »

Posted by Samuel W. Velsor IV - via MuckRack, Jay Rosen, Craig Newmark, Robert Scoble, Dan Gillmor, Publish2 (Politics), New York Times (Most Emailed), Drudge Report
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 14 (as of 2009-08-13)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Samuel W. Velsor IV - Aug 13, 2009 - 10:58 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Dwight Rousu - Aug 14, 2009 - 12:26 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.7
by Oliver Jones - Aug. 14, 2009

This brief story attempts, without much success, to put the accusations of mandatory euthanasia into context. Every day in any hospitals there are questions about whether a dying patient should be put on a respirator, or not. This story might have done better if it dealt with those situations, not just crude Nazi-era eugenics.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Biopic-portrait-sm_thumb
4.0
by Kelly Garrett - Aug. 14, 2009

An interesting twist on the fact checking stories that have been published recently, focusing on the origin of the "death panel" rumor. It would have been nice to include responses from more prominent advocates (Beck, Palin, etc.)

See Full Review » (14 answers)
N5513221_4128_thumb
4.5
by Joey Baker - Aug. 15, 2009
See Full Review » (5 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.2
by Randy Morrow - Aug. 15, 2009

Call me crazy but I think the unsupported assertions made in the following quote are irresponsible political opportunism--dare I say...crazy. ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
N1268743943_3841_thumb
4.7
by Judy Plapinger - Aug. 14, 2009

More of these stories are needed--and they should be on the front page!

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.0

Good
from 5 reviews (64% confidence)
Quality
4.0
Facts
4.5
Fairness
3.8
Information
4.0
Insight
4.0
Sourcing
3.6
Style
4.0
Balance
3.0
Context
4.0
Depth
3.8
Enterprise
3.8
Relevance
4.5
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.0
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
2.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!