How False Narrative Works

Over the past couple of decades, the Republicans have benefited enormously from their ability to create and disseminate false narratives through the Right's large, well-financed media apparatus.

Over the past couple of decades, the Republicans have benefited enormously from their ability to create and disseminate false narratives through the Right's large, well-financed media apparatus.

With mainstream journalists unwilling to challenge the false narratives - and thus put their careers at risk - American voters often go to the polls believing things that are almost the opposite of the truth. Full Story »

Posted by Dwight Rousu
Tags Help
Subjects: U.S., Media, Politics
Member Tags: media. mainstream media, presidential campaign 2000
Stats Help
Opinions as factsHelp: 3
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dwight Rousu - Nov 14, 2007 - 12:34 PM PST
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Nov 14, 2007 - 6:38 PM PST

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Silhouette_sml
3.3
by Rory O'Connor - Nov. 14, 2007

The authors' stated premise is that "Over the past couple of decades, the Republicans have benefited enormously from their ability to create and disseminate false narratives through the Right’s large, well-financed media apparatus." As a result, they contend, "American voters often go to the polls believing things that are almost the opposite of the truth." THey then detail, in an excerpt from their book Neck Deep: The Disastrous Presidency of George W. Bush, one such case study ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
2.8
by Kaizar Campwala - Nov. 14, 2007

It's important to keep the media honest and point out media failures from the past. This piece is successful at doing so. However, it's done in a very partisan way/one-sided, using language that is counterproductive. Several time the author states his opinions as if they were facts.

See Full Review » (12 answers)
Jack_dinkmeyer_thumb
5.0
by Jack Dinkmeyer - Nov. 14, 2007

Good background about the disinformation policy of Cheney-Bush and a lesson for all. It's been a frustrating seven years for those of us who saw through Bush about the time of the Bob Jones debacle before the 2000 election. Throughout those years, every time an outrageous disinformation campaign was launched: WMD, Mission Accomplished, torture. war on terrorism--the list goes on and on--I thought now, finally, the American people are going to rise up in protest at such outrageous ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
3.8
by Jim Filby - Nov. 16, 2007

The attack here is truly on the 4th estate. The research that one would expect from journalists is shown to be lacking. Whether that is complacency on the part of journalists due to the attitude of "another Clinton screwup" or whether it is just plain lazy of them not to investigate further from the FUD from the Cox report is unknown. In a republic where the electorate is limited to the news they can get from the mainstream media -or, perhaps worst, a secondary media that requires ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
Silhouette_sml
2.9
by Martha Champion - Nov. 14, 2007
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Member_photo_thumb
4.2
by Dwight Rousu - Nov. 14, 2007

The story presents an interesting bit of history on the intentional misinformation about scandals. If we are informed from the past, we are less likely to be fooled again in the future.

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.9
by Jay Pocius - Nov. 16, 2007
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Steven Holt - Nov. 16, 2007
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
5.0
by Wayland T Washington - Nov. 14, 2007
See Full Review » (6 answers)
Silhouette_sml
4.3
by J. Edwards - Nov. 14, 2007
See Full Review » (6 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.1

Good
from 10 reviews (50% confidence)
Quality
4.1
Facts
4.2
Fairness
4.1
Information
4.4
Sourcing
3.9
Style
3.8
Accuracy
4.0
Balance
3.2
Context
4.0
Popularity
3.9
Recommendation
4.1
Credibility
4.0
# Reviews
5.0
# Views
1.2
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!