Europe Finds Clean Energy in Trash, but U.S. Lags Behind

New incinerators reduce energy costs and reliance on oil and gas and also benefit the environment, but they have not caught on in the United States. Full Story »

Posted by Dan Kennedy - via New York Times (Most Emailed), NewsRack (Energy), miker1717 (t), Salvador Sala (t), Ish Harshawat (t), Jon Mitchell (t), Kaizar Campwala (f), Fabrice Florin (f), Tobie Openshaw (f), Margaret Yonco-Haines (f)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Diggs: 14 (as of 2010-04-13)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Dan Kennedy - Apr 12, 2010 - 1:45 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Kaizar Campwala - Apr 13, 2010 - 6:31 AM PDT

Reviews

Show All | Notes | Comments | Quotes | Links
Kaizar Campwala
4.1
by Kaizar Campwala - Apr. 13, 2010

An enjoyable read. I learned a lot about the incineration of trash, and why it's been successful in Europe and not in America.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Dan Kennedy
4.5
by Dan Kennedy - Apr. 13, 2010

An important story on how European countries, especially Denmark, are using high-tech incinerators to turn trash into energy in an environmentally sound way. As the journalist notes, political considerations make it almost impossible to build such incinerators in the United States.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Lauren Duffy
4.8
by Lauren Duffy - May. 25, 2010

This is an in-depth article that shows Europe's alternative energy practice of using garbage as an energy source. The piece also outlines the reasons behind the U.S.'s resistance to of converting garbage for heat and electricity purposes. The article does not explain key scientific concepts within the article but instead outlines Europe's advances in clean energy in a clear and concise way. The article consults both scholars and environmentalists to give a wide variety of opinions within the piece.

See Full Review » (10 answers)
Ro Stowe
4.4
by Ro Stowe - Apr. 18, 2010

The story adequately described the differences between U.S. and Europe's adoption of waste incineration technologies. It explains the purpose of the plants well, describing their benefits and costs to the communities which decide to support them. It offers unique perspectives on high income communities that support incinerators, which unlikely exists in the U.S. Mostly, I like tbe attention to the history of garbage incineration. The graphic comparing old and new energy capturing technology further points out benefits to burning in a numbers format.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Noelle Lovgren
3.7
by Noelle Lovgren - Apr. 15, 2010

This story seemed a bit biased against the United States due to the fact that it is written in Denmark. They seemed to emphasize the fact that these garbage disposal systems are in Denmark instead of emphasizing the innovation of these machines. The story also has a severe lack of quotes, which makes it seem very monotonous. I also believe the story could have been shortened, as it was too long.

See Full Review » (4 answers)

Comments on this story (2)Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.2

Good
from 7 reviews (35% confidence)
Quality
4.2
Facts
4.8
Fairness
3.7
Sourcing
3.8
Style
4.7
Context
4.7
Depth
4.7
Enterprise
3.7
Relevance
3.5
Popularity
4.6
Recommendation
4.4
Credibility
5.0
# Reviews
3.5
# Views
5.0
# Likes
2.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

No links yet. Please review this story to add some!