Four years after reforms, why another mine disaster?

At least 25 miners died in a massive explosion at a Massey Energy mine....with four more miners still missing inside the Upper Big Branch Mine near Montcoal.

How could this happen?

"It tells me one of two things," said longtime mine safety crusader Davitt McAteer, who ran...[MSHA] during the Clinton years. "One, the law isn't being enforced or, two, the law didn't go far enough."

By Tuesday, there was evidence that both could be true. Full Story »

Posted by Beth Wellington - via Kaizar Campwala (t), Fabrice Florin (t)
Tags Help
Stats Help
# Tweets: 7 (as of 2010-04-06)
Editorial Help
Posted by: Posted by Beth Wellington - Apr 6, 2010 - 7:22 PM PDT
Content Type: Article
Edit Lock: This story can be edited
Edited by: Beth Wellington - Apr 6, 2010 - 11:56 PM PDT
Beth Wellington
4.6
by Beth Wellington - Apr. 12, 2010

Ward puts the Montcoal disaster in a larger context by examining mining law passed after the last major US disaster, also in WV, at Sago. He interviews Davitt McAteer and Tony Oppegard, former MSHA officials who come from a safety, rather than industry background (unlike subsequent appointees) He outlines how the WV communications and tracking legislation falls short of MSHA requirements. My favorite quote is from Oppegard, along with Ward's writing surrounding it. (See the quote I've included. The final bill passed was not as strong as originally submitted and that Labor Committee chair George Miller has slacked off in making improvements since a president from his own party was elected. A small quibble: the story would ... More »

“I’ve never thought the MINER Act went far enough,” said Tony Oppegard, a former MSHA staffer and mine ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Betsy Taylor
5.0
by Betsy Taylor - Apr. 7, 2010

In a short space, this article analyzes underlying causes of the mine disaster in Montcoal WV on 4/5/10. It is excellent in 3 ways: the historical context it provides, the writer's detailed knowledge of the geography & people, the high quality of experts used as sources. Unlike many of the national level journalists who are coming in to cover this story, Ken Ward has the advantage of local & regional knowledge -- so his article distills many complex questions about a) quality of safety regulations (do they match up well with the real technical & human dangers) and b) the quality of enforcement. His depth of background knowledge allows him to focus on most important issues & best sources with seasoned expertise. This shows ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Kristin Gorski
4.0
by Kristin Gorski - Apr. 7, 2010

A very solid analysis of the conditions leading to the recent fatal Montcoal accident. Reported by a staff writer from an area newspaper, the Charleston (WV) Gazette. Asks all the right questions, which will hopefully lead to answers and opportunities for real, substantial mine safety reform.

Still, independent mine safety advocates on Tuesday repeated one common criticism of the MINER Act: its emphasis on emergency response instead of ... More »

See Full Review » (13 answers)
Elizabeth White-Nadler
4.0
by Elizabeth White-Nadler - Apr. 6, 2010

This article is particularly valuable for readers unfamiliar with the safety issues which plague the mining industry, and who may not recall details of previous disasters nor corrective measures which were attempted. The writing is clear, concise, and vividly describes which factors likely contributed to this latest disaster.

My first question when I heard about the safety violations at this mine was "where was the Union?" Later I heard in an interview that this mine (and not coincidentally, mines with the worst safety records) was not unionized. What this says to me is that the management/ownership was operating essentially without oversight--laws were evaded or not enforced, and employees who feared losing their livelihoods were forced to play Russian Roulette with their lives. I hope this latest ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)
Barry Grossheim
4.4
by Barry Grossheim - Apr. 13, 2010

This article shows that passing laws are one thing. Inspections and enforcement are entirely another. A sad story but it seems doubtful that anyone will be held accountable.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
Cathie Bird
4.7
by Cathie Bird - Apr. 12, 2010

Since moving to the east Tennessee coalfields I have relied on journalists like Ken Ward to fill gaps in my understanding of the bigger picture of coal mining. As often happens, this article gave me a chance to gauge what I know and don't know yet. It's been useful to me to acquire a number of different lenses through which to view coalfield communities, the coal industry, and the policy and regulatory structure that surrounds (or impinges upon) both. It's clear to me that we're ... More »

See Full Review » (11 answers)

Comments on this story Help (BETA)

NT Rating | My Rating

Ratings

4.4

Good
from 6 reviews (73% confidence)
Quality
4.5
Facts
4.5
Fairness
4.5
Sourcing
4.3
Style
4.4
Context
4.6
Depth
4.2
Enterprise
4.6
Relevance
4.6
Popularity
4.3
Recommendation
4.6
Credibility
4.2
# Reviews
3.0
# Views
5.0
# Likes
1.0
# Emails
1.0
More
How our ratings work »
(See these related stories.)

Links Help

  • Other dangerous mines? Federal data can't tell you

    (Blog Post) ...he information is hidden behind a cumbersome search interface, one that's geared more to users who know the name of the mine or the company that operates it (Performance ...
    Posted by Beth Wellington
  • Massey Draws Scorn Even on Wall Street

    Massey's mountaintop removal has come under fire from environmental groups and even caused some Wall Street banks, Bank of America and Citigroup, to halt financing for the ...
    Posted by Betsy Taylor