I would consider this an example of badly biased journalism. Giving a front page spread to a small minority outside the meeting, and repeating illogical charges with the megaphone of the Washington Post and absolutely no fact-checking of the ridiculous charges seems an exhibition of extreme right wing bias.

This is a nicely done piece on one laid-off worker's frustration with the economy/national focus/etc. The author has done the homework necessary to put some background and personalized information into this feature without bias. There are no surprises here; Mr. Millam seems clearly to be an embittered product of the globalization of his job at Kraft and of slanted television news and talk-show hyperbole. None of this is the President's fault, of course, but Millam's pain is palpable.

This is a story that was entertaining and told the side of the protester in good detail. However, if one was looking to be informed about the issues surrounding the piece, I would advise looking elsewhere.

Insightful story on a day in the life of a Tea Party activist, documenting his protest against big government during President Obama's visit to Iowa. This report is factual, fair and well-written, providing an informative account of what Tea Party supporters are thinking, without any attempt to denigrate or interpret their viewpoint.

An account of a day in the life of a Tea Party protesters. The author works hard to focus on descriptions of the events without adding much interpretation. A very different view of the Tea Party than is often seen in the media these days.

This story seems to be suffering from a bit of an identity crisis. Is it a profile of a tea party member? That's great, and as that, the piece would work wonderfully, but the focus is a little ambiguous for that. The writing is thoroughly complementary towards the subject, and attempts at balance are too subtle.

In terms of adding a human element to the story of healthcare, this piece succeeds, however, it really does little in terms of telling the news story at large.

Quality journalism requires research and multiple sources. This article has neither.

The story is poorly sourced. It only shows the plight and perspective of one person and is purely a profile piece of a "tea party" member. The reporter should have made this much clearer at the top of the story and present this in that light rather than a legitimate and knowledgeable person regarding the issues discussed.

The story isn't interesting. There was no climax; nothing happened. It was very one-sided. There could have been some input from an opposing side. The concept is interesting but it could have been improved if something actually happened.

I think how you view this article will depend a lot on whether you agree with Millam or not.Standing on its own, it kind of is what it is - a little profile of a frustrated American-turned-Tea-Party-advocate. But it's hard to understand why Millam, specifically, is important. It feels limited in scope. Also there is no such thing as a 24-hour energy drink.