William Owney

Member (since June 2009)
Help

I have spent 40 years as a writer, journalist and educator.

About William Help
Last Visit: Oct 15, 2009 - 3:02 PM PDT
Last Edit: Aug 13, 2009 - 9:40 AM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Likes
William reviewed this story - Aug 28, 2009
William's Rating
4.2

It often seems like Ben Smith is grinding axes, but this piece indicates he is capable of real journalism: Doing solid research, presenting it fairly, and stand out of the way. Though the piece is choppy and cries for a good editor adept at transitions, it would be acceptable work coming from a journalism major near graduation.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.1
William reviewed this story - Aug 11, 2009
William's Rating
1.9

The entire premise proceeds from Mr. Hitchens' medical assessment of two women done via photographs taken at a distance compared to: Nothing. He chooses to argue with two other writers by setting them up as straw dogs; yet, even against an opponent made of straw, he proffers not arguments, but insults. Calling someone who does not have the right of reply "boot lick" or "inexpert bore." Is not polemics: It is playground bullying.

This sort of angry talking head B.S. is exactly what it wrong with contemporary "journalism." A good editor -- or a mediocre English teacher, ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 2.9
William reviewed and liked this story - Aug 10, 2009
William's Rating
5.0

Just the facts. Both sides given ample opportunity to explain in context.

Too little of this simple, to-the-point journalism these days. Everybody wants to be a screaming (and rich) talking head. Not enough want to be that ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.3
William reviewed and liked this story - Aug 10, 2009
William's Rating
5.0

Just the facts. Both sides given ample opportunity to explain in context.

Too little of this simple, to-the-point journalism these days. Everybody wants to be a screaming (and rich) talking head. Not enough want to be that ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.3
William reviewed this story - Aug 10, 2009
William's Rating
4.5

This is a broad, complex story and The Post apparently made every effort to get both sides at every critical juncture. It takes journalistic skill and personal courage to work around a deliberately obdurate bureaucracy.

America would do well to ship a boat load of her bankers to Dubai.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.7
William reviewed this story - Jul 14, 2009
William's Rating
3.2

This meta view of contemporary American politics appears to be predominantly objective and in generally acceptable context. It offers original analysis and does not present any overt bias. It is top-drawer journalism.

Nagourney's analysis rests on a concept for which he is the sole source: The idea that there are two types of comebacks. He then use that predicate ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.5
William reviewed this story - Jul 13, 2009
William's Rating
3.7

This appears to be better sourced and more tightly edited than the typical Rueters piece

See Full Review » (6 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.0
William reviewed this story - Jul 4, 2009
William's Rating
2.1

While Moore has some interesting insight, this piece lacks foundation and independent reporting. If there are rumors, what are they, how credible are they, how are they affected by her resignation. If those questions cannot be answered and confirmed, leave the rumor-mongering to the pros on Twitter.

Though I am often politically aligned with Huffington writers, their increasing stridency is irritating. Even subjective pieces, no, make that ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 2.4
William reviewed this story - Jul 2, 2009
William's Rating
3.8

It's a straight news report of an important event. There is no attempt at balance, i.e., solicitation of reaction from opponents; but that will come in due time. It is not essential to coverage of a breaking event

See Full Review » (6 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.3
William reviewed and liked this story - Jun 26, 2009
William's Rating
4.4

For an opinion piece, it is fair in the way it depicts both sides of the issue. It is insightful and contextual in its analysis, though the short course in marginal utility is a bit difficult to follow.

The piece seems to overlook a major issue (also overlooked by mainstream media): Insurance companies pool all their risk. If AETNA looses money in ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.5
William reviewed this story - Jun 26, 2009
William's Rating
4.2

Fairly reported. Written with the Time's customary insistence on broad "cosmic" overview, which may or may not be fully supported further down in the copy.

It's obvious that the Times is off its beat and is relying on the reporting of others to guide it. Reads like a second-day story. Not particularly ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.6
William reviewed this story - Jun 25, 2009
William's Rating
1.5

The piece lacks balance and historical context. What, precisely, would the writer have the United States do? And how, precisely, would a precipitous move by the United States affect oil prices, and what affect would that have global economic recovery? What is going on in Iran today is internal and, as the president appeared to understand, is at the beginning of a process. Intervention by outside forces would immediately terminate that process. Enough of the Cowboy diplomacy, please!

What, precisely, would the writer have the United States do? And how, precisely, would a precipitous move by the United States affect oil prices, ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 2.1
William reviewed this story - Jun 22, 2009
William's Rating
4.0

The reporting is factual, objective, in-depth and in context. Important background and historical information is adroitly weaved into the narrative. The headline and lede are mildly misleading. The story is more about a water shortage than snakes.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.2
William reviewed and liked this story - Jun 16, 2009
William's Rating
4.5

Long duree. The writer articulates a useful context born of an in-depth comprehension of the social structures at play. This is so much more than the thin veneer that characterizes much of contemporary reportage.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.2
William reviewed this story - Jun 1, 2009
William's Rating
2.4

The "reporting" begins with a series of unsubstantiated assertions. When did sourcing cease to be a journalistic requisite? Further down, the reporting becomes more factual. It's as if the reporters wrote one story and the higher-ups put their version on top of it.

What about the millions of shareholders, many of them retirees on fixed incomes, who learned only at the last minute that existing stockholders ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.5
William reviewed this story - Jun 1, 2009
William's Rating
4.5

The reporting is factual. Written for a broad audience, the story is not able to go into as great depth as it would if it focused on only one corporation.

The big whiff in the news media's coverage of the GM story is that hundreds of thousands of small investors -- many retirees counting on dividend ... More »

See Full Review » (7 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.8
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
2.6 avg.
2.6 avg.
Activity
2.4 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
3.6 avg.
Transparency
1.0 avg.
Validation
3.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Story Reviews
15
Number of Raters
6
Ratings Received
13
Number of Comments
0
Ratings Given
0
Story Answers
75

Member Ratings

Ratings given by William (0) Help

No ratings given yet.


Ratings received by William (see all 13) Help

4 out of 5 rating - click to see review from Tanya J. Maurer | 08/11/2009
More ratings »
(NEW)

William's Widget

Add this widget to your site »