This is mostly speculation on the part of the author. He has good reason to surmise what he surmises, but there's no factual content of the existence of Iraq Pentagon Papers. He bases his opinion merely on the fact of the existence of Vietnam's Pentagon Papers. He's persuasive in his argument, but he provides no evidence.

Mr. Malakoff is reporting on his study of why fisheries have not rebounded despite moratoriums after over-fishing. That we downgrade the genetic pool when we take the biggest and the strongest of a species, leaving the small, weak or feeble to survive and breed, i.e. hunters who like to take the biggest bucks with the biggest racks, for example. Mr. Malakoff has seen that process will result in a rapid evolution that reduces a species to nothing but "runts."

Mr. Kennedy makes a great case that the 2004 election was rigged in favor of Bush siting numerous sources from all sides of the spectrum and fitting all of the pieces of the puzzle together in one nice package.

This is one person's opinion - hence the low marks for "sources" and "fairness." But I'd say that it's an interesting look at the reasons behind a conservative's disenchantment with Bush and the Republican party.