Sally Lehrman

Member (since February 2009)
Help

I teach journalism courses and also maintain my work as an independent journalist covering science and social issues for a variety of print, Web and broadcast outlets.

About Sally Help
Occupation: Knight Ridder Chair in Journalism in the Public Interest, Santa Clara University
Expertise: Science and society; race and gender issues; inclusive coverage
Affiliations: Society of Professional Journalists American Society of Journalists and Authors National Writers Union Media Workers Guild
Contact Info Help
Last Visit: Nov 15, 2009 - 9:45 AM PST
Last Edit: Oct 6, 2009 - 6:56 PM PDT

To:


Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.

Note:

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Likes | Comments
Sally reviewed this story - Oct 12, 2009
Sally's Rating
3.0

The author makes a good effort to explain critical details of the debate but offers only one source in each area and allows logical inconsistencies to creep in.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.4
Sally reviewed this story - Sep 19, 2009
Sally's Rating
2.6

Limbaugh's comments were indeed noteworthy, but more context is needed to show what his words may (or may not) represent in overall trends about race-based name-calling and tensions about race.

See Full Review » (4 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.3
Sally reviewed this story - Apr 30, 2009
Sally's Rating
2.6

This piece is interesting, but a confusing read with pro/con comments about Twitter and news media thrown in like, well, a flood of tweets.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.8
Sally posted and reviewed this story - Apr 29, 2009
Sally's Rating
4.0
See Full Review » (1 answer)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.1
Sally posted and reviewed this story - Apr 29, 2009
Sally reviewed this story - Apr 19, 2009
Sally's Rating
2.2

This piece doesn't venture much beyond whatever the Zenn car promoters seem to be claiming. There is no context about other cars and longer-distance batteries also under development.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 2.7
Sally reviewed this story - Apr 19, 2009
Sally's Rating
3.0

This piece does a wonderful job citing data and then breaking down important aspects of research such as sample size and composition. But it offers little historical context (the first study cited was in 1899!), doesn't question all this interest in measuring penises, and seems to assume that men's worries about being "small" are valid if they fall below the average.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.2
Sally reviewed this story - Apr 19, 2009
Sally's Rating
3.8

It's not journalism, but an op-ed. It raises important issues and invites readers to think about them. I would have liked to have seen sources beyond the usual suspects.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.8
Sally reviewed this story - Feb 28, 2009
Sally's Rating
3.2

It's interesting to me that this story is framed around the question of whether or not we should talk about race publicly. The presumption is very white-centered, because only whites (primarily) have the choice of ignoring or avoiding race. Other that than, the piece does bring in a good range of perspectives. The final quotes, however, seemed dumped in without offering much context or even sensitivity as to what the speaker really intends -- especially Cobb's reference to structural racism.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.6
Sally reviewed this story - Feb 28, 2009
Sally's Rating
4.8

This piece does a great job in raising an important issue, offering compelling data, and then laying out potential solutions.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.8
Sally reviewed this story - Feb 28, 2009
Sally's Rating
3.2

Miller takes on an important issue, but I'd like to hear more about just what we're missing by ignoring black history most of the time. This piece does a nice job awakening listeners to the issue, but doesn't compel us to work harder to learn the black chords of American history.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 3.6
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
4.0 avg.
4.0 avg.
Activity
2.4 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
5.0 avg.
Transparency
2.0 avg.
Validation
5.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Story Reviews
10
Number of Raters
1
Ratings Received
1
Number of Comments
0
Ratings Given
0
Story Answers
74

Member Ratings

Ratings given by Sally (0) Help

No ratings given yet.


Ratings received by Sally (1) Help

(NEW)

Sally's Widget