Many things were not explained adequately in this article, like what OECD stands for. There were not many people quoted or interviewed for this article. It was not something I did not already know either and from the headline, I expected some new information to be presented because it seemed like such an obvious statement.

This was very interactive and educational. It had many sources that were knowledgeable and trustworthy. My only qualm was that it was not so balanced because it was done by an organization to raise awareness for global warming. I wish it would have had a more trustworthy source to talk about how global warming is caused because the facts that were presented did not match up with what we are learning in my geology class.

I learned a lot from this article, but it seems like more sources could have been explored. I think the article was very well written and presented an interesting view on soldiers and on faith in the United States.

This article states the obvious without going much in depth into anything. I also think the end could have been the beginning or tied back to the main story better.

This is a very one sided article. The officer involved was not interviewed. The reason why Gina Rooker was pulled over in the first place was never researched. Only Rooker is quoted.