It states the figures then draws a logical conclusion.

This story points out the facts of the obama accomplishment and shows by stistics that they have not been communicated.

the writer gives examples to support the point of Kelly's bias they are making. remember kelly's insistence On "fair and balanced".The questuion to ask people of Kelley opinion is: What do they consider LEFT? Is pro Social Security Left? Is having rich people pay taxes left? Is having the government do something about the problems experienced by Wall street left? Is helping unemployed people survive left ? etc etc

I disagree with their premise about polarization. This assumption thrwos the whole story off.

The left is annoyed because it is not the govrnment which is the problem but the moneyed power that pulls the strings to manipulate the government that is the problem. The years of Republican preaching Government is the problem (while rushing to get into it) has paid off. Why do you think Congress helped enable the financial disaster to happen ? which by the way happened in The Republican's (Bush) watch.

He quotes both siides, but I would be interested in who is pushing this legislation. What party ? What group ? In other words I would like the story to dig a little deeper

The elephant in the room that the writer mentiokns is our maintaining bases around the world at enormous cost. The military spending must be cut if the nation is to survive. We cannot contnue on a constant war footing and not destroy both the economic and social base of the country.

The author is arguing for a point and tries to give the supporting reasons his conclusion shopuld be accepted, all this without accusations or particularly loaded writing.

The story was doing fine until the end when they pronounced the magic word "competition" which would take car of everything if the big boys close the web. I don't think so !!!

This is, of course, an editorial, full of assumptions and statement telling us what "Washington" is thinking. there are powerful interests in Washington who want to nullify Iran. Iran is also the only nation which stands in the way of total control of the region by the US now that we have subdued and are occupying Iraq.

The story just gives us facts about the arms sales, but doesn't touch the implcations to both the US and the world. However, one needs the facts if one is to discuss the implications, coasts, and policies to which these facts lead.

A well written and very subtle defence of Cheney, giving a short account of charges and then long defenses by Cheney relying on the tried and true justification, used down through history including bu the Japanese who waterboarded Americans and were prosecuted, - National defense, security., thus leaving the reader with a definite bias for Cheney.

There is little "reason" involved in this article.

No. It quotes the Republican without ever commenting on the validity or logic of what they are quoting

While well written interms of style, this is not quality journalism. certain facts and elements of the problem are gathered and arranged to arrive at an already determined conclusion.

It goes beyond merely quoting both sides to a more indepth investigation of those involved in the medical debate

The writer uses the classic rhetorical technique of setting forth the arguments against public medicine and then refuting them.

No. Purely a hatchet job. It is a FACT that Medicare administrative costs are less than the insurance companies. Of course public health care would be expensive -- health care is expensive

The interviewers go to an authority on the subject who has collected the facts and statistics. They let the interviewee tell the story.

The story fails to dig below the obvious. Takes opinions without questioning them. concentrates on the numbers not the reality

Well written with strong central point which is well developed and exampled