Most of the content of the story was written without giving the reader the full context of where the facts were coming from. There were only two people quoted in the entire article, and they both were pro-'green new deal.' We wished there were an opposing view on the subject mentioned in the article, to give full credibility to the story. The story touches upon an important topic, but lacks thorough reporting.

Many different but important people are quoted in this story. The author does take a strong stance beginning in the first paragraph, saying "the world needs more dollars. the united states is preparing to provide them." I trust the publication (Bloomberg) but I do feel this was writen with the author clearly choosing a side, but he does report for both sides.

This author who penned this piece is the head of an economic development body and a member of the Labour Housing Group's executive. So really, it can be taken for what it's worth by his affiliations. He did not quote anybody but it is an interesting subject.

This is quality journalism because there are a number of sources that the writer quotes. It is informative and presents the facts in a clear and concise manner.