The article is short and to the point, it's very factual and cites it sources well. The article gives a good non biased look at what's going on.
See Full Review »
(4 answers)
Max Haller
Member (since February 2010)
About Max
Last Visit:
Apr 4, 2010 - 5:13 PM PDT
Last Edit:
Feb 5, 2010 - 9:00 AM PST
This profile can be seen by everyone, including search engines.
|
Network
|
Max reviewed this story - Apr 4, 2010
Max reviewed this story - Apr 4, 2010
the article does a good job of reporting what's going on in Texas with out taking sides. Both parties were given a fair chance to give their side of what's happening. Its a very factual article.
See Full Review »
(4 answers)
Max reviewed this story - Apr 4, 2010
this article brings up important information about the water issues in California. It could have been more in depth but did a good job in getting the main idea across.
See Full Review »
(4 answers)
Max reviewed this story - Mar 24, 2010
Max reviewed this story - Mar 24, 2010
This is a well written story. Its clear they did their research for this story.The article seems to have a fair representation of both sides. The article wasn't purely neutral to Monsanto but there is a lot of evidence that makes them look pretty bad.
See Full Review »
(4 answers)
Max reviewed this story - Mar 1, 2010
See Full Review »
(4 answers)
Member Level
1.8 avg.
Stats
Member Ratings
Ratings received by Max
(3)
Ratings given by Max
No ratings given yet.
I think its more of an argument then a source of accurate information. They make it sound sound BLM is kidnapping children to work for their evil cooperation. They're just wrangling horses. Everyone they interviewed was clearly a horse rights advocate. The way they worded everything they said makes me feel like they're relying on emotional appeal rather than actual facts. I don't believe most of what they are saying because its all so one sided. If the horses could talk im sure they ... More »