Matthew Erdman

Member (since February 2010)
Help

About Matthew Help
Last Visit: May 7, 2010 - 7:49 AM PDT
Last Edit: Jul 20, 2010 - 10:59 AM PDT

This profile can be seen by everyone, including search engines. Help
| Network |

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Starred | Comments
Matthew reviewed this story - May 7, 2010
Matthew's Rating
3.3

This was a good article. It gave a lot of good details and background information. I didnt feel like it was biased or anything like that either. I enjoyed the article.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.1 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Apr 30, 2010
Matthew's Rating
2.7

I felt like this article didnt really tell the whole story. It really didnt have much detail and was relatively short.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.3 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Apr 23, 2010
Matthew's Rating
4.2

I thought this was a very good article. The article gave the reader a lot of facts and that the article was very intriguing. The article had a lot of information as well. It gave the reader research, numbers, data etc. It wasnt that biased either, it just explained to the reader the situation. I enjoyed this article.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 4.2 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Apr 16, 2010
Matthew's Rating
3.3

I enjoyed this article. I thought it was well written. It gave a a good look at what happened. It didnt seem to biased to me either. I felt like it just told you what happened and that was it, it didnt really point any fingers.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Apr 9, 2010
Matthew's Rating
2.4

This article in my opinion wasnt that good. It was short, didnt have many facts and was biased. The article seemed to be against this fact that this judge "illegally" approved the water bank. The article didnt really give alot of information about the situation at hand it seemed like it just gave the reader a quick summary of what happened.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 2.4 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Mar 26, 2010
Matthew's Rating
3.3

In my opinion this article was a little short and the author perhaps could've done a little more research. However, what's good about the article is that is wasnt really biased or anything like that it just gave us the details of what the situation is.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.7 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Mar 24, 2010
Matthew's Rating
4.0

This is a good article for anyone. It was informative, interesting and quite unique. The article was well written and provided the reader with a bunch of facts and new information.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Mar 24, 2010
Matthew's Rating
3.6

I thought this was a good article. It was packed with lots of information. I felt like it was too biased in one direction. It was a little complex of an article but definitely a good read for any educated reader.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.6 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Mar 24, 2010
Matthew's Rating
2.1

I found this article to be quite poor. I felt as though it was just written to bash the BLM and it was based solely on the author's opinion and not on facts. The article was extremely biased against the BLM and only gives the reader one side of the story. Although the videos were quite interesting the article was lacking alot of detail and research. It seemed to me that is was just some sort of propaganda against the BLM, not much of an article.

“Half of the country’s wild horses are in Nevada and the BLM is gathering them off of public land in record numbers with increasingly ... More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
NT Rating: 2.7 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew reviewed this story - Mar 24, 2010
Matthew's Rating
2.5

I didnt really think this was a real superb article. It was relatively short and was mostly just about numbers and statistics. There was no real detail. Like I stated before, It's just numbers.

See Full Review » (11 answers)
NT Rating: 3.6 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew posted and reviewed this story - Mar 1, 2010
Matthew's Rating
3.8

I liked this article. I thought it provided a lot of information and that it was really that biased. There were a lot of facts that the author presented in the article and it was an easy read. It was quite interesting as well.

Controversy over rules affecting organic milk, butter, yogurt, cheese and other dairy products is heating up in Washington, D.C. More »

See Full Review » (12 answers)
NT Rating: 3.8 | See All NT Reviews »
Matthew posted and reviewed this story - Feb 25, 2010
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
2.3 avg.
2.3 avg.
Activity
2.9 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
4.5 avg.
Transparency
1.0 avg.
Validation
2.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Reviews
12
Answers
120
Comments
0
Ratings Received
6
Number of Raters
1
Ratings Given
0

Member Ratings

Ratings received by Matthew (see all 5) Help

5 out of 5 rating - click to see review from Aimee deChambeau | 03/24/2010
5 out of 5 rating - click to see review from Aimee deChambeau | 03/24/2010


Ratings given by Matthew Help

No ratings given yet.

Matthew's Widget