I like the comparisons to the other presidents concerning their relationship to the media. However, I think it just might spark more debate about how biased the media is.
To:
Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.
Note:
I liked this article because it showed how much of Obama's agenda he had accomplished, and which goals he was working toward. I like how it also mentions which of his promises he has ignored.
Yes it is quality journalism, it is a very interesting way of looking at Obama's term. I like that it was video, I think that it makes it much more effective in this case than print.
No because it is very slanted. Although they use some sources, they only offer one point of view, and it is clearly anti-Republican.
Yes, they back it up with sources and facts, and offer opposing points of view. Also, it is very well written with no personal opinion showing.




If something like this did happen, it would be good to know, but I need both sides.