This article is very well written. This is very factual. this would be a great article if it had some opinion. Its nice to state facts but there needs to be an analytical piece of this article that shows an opinion.
This is what I call great journalism. This gets strait to the point and gives actually facts to the topic I was seeking to gain more knowledge in. This has really help to understand the affects on families in the country in the whole affected by the earthquake. I would recommend that this be one of the first sites you look of to get a good understanding of what happened with the healthcare system thanks to the earthquake in haiti.
This a good article but not great. If i was to advise a friend to look for information about the global economy and how it affects a region, I would tell them to go to more of a reliable source. This is great for follow up information.
This story needs to have more facts. There were multiple hyperlinks but for the leisurely reader this would become to much of a hassle. After reading this article I did not feel like I came away with great analysis of a conclusion that makes me see the trading industry different for the Oceania region.
This piece seemed like more of an Op-Ed. There wasn't many facts to back up the writers opinions. There were mentions of some important date but no sources to back up very important claims. It seems as though the writer wanted to go on a rant about the crisis and Japan, but at the same time throw in a couple of statements of why this is bad for Australia. This would be great if there were more facts to back up the claims.
This artilce gave a different view of the nuclear plants. This brought to light many different scandals in the world of nuclear plants. It seems like this crisis was bound to happen but the real question is why were the owners not prepared for the crisis.