Daniel C. Walsh

Member (since April 2006)
Help

About Daniel Help
Last Visit: Nov 16, 2010 - 8:19 AM PST
Last Edit: Never

This profile can be seen by everyone, including search engines. Help
| Network |

Activity

Show all | Reviews | Posts | Starred | Comments
Daniel reviewed this story - Nov 16, 2010
Daniel's Rating
4.0

I believe the facts as stated in this article, but for those of us unable to take advantage of Medicare Advantage, I am not sure that this is a cut in Medicare benefits. In my area of South Carolina, I was told by my doctor not to take Medicare Advantage because almost no one in the area participates in it. I have traditional Medicare and I have no real complaints about it (except Part D, which is a program of limited benefits that resulted when George Bush caved in to the drug industry and stacked the deck against the recipients.)

See Full Review » (4 answers)
NT Rating: 3.9 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - May 30, 2009
Daniel's Rating
4.1

Balanced reporting

See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 3.9 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
3.4

Okay article, but not a lot of detail--would rather have read the report it referred to.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
NT Rating: 3.9 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.9

The Washington Blade has been around for years; its stories are usually well-researched and factual. I believe that this article points out yet another tragic decision by the US government (and the supposedly liberal Bill Clinton, who appears to be as homophobic as George Bush). I ususally judge good journalism by my gut--and my gut tells me this story is unfortunately true.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 3.8 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.9

Brings to mind Woodward and Bernstein. It is journalism at its finest, to my way of thinking. And it certainly gives question as to who the real president of the US is. I only wonder why Bush has been as lame as he has, and brought Cheney under control.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
NT Rating: 3.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.9

Very clear and precise--gets to the point without skipping the background information.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
NT Rating: 3.4 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.8

It is good journalism because it checked with the source of the story and rebuts the points made by the author. I think it would be clearer exactly what is being said here if I had been able to read the initial story, and be better able to speak to the "good journalism" of this story.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 3.7 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
5.0

While just a news report, it was well written, concise, and to the point.

See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 4.0 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.5
See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 4.5 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.4

It is fairly good journalism--it identifis the issue and dissects it, asking why is a gay kiss any different than a straight one. But the issue to me was more of the reaction to the kiss. Why did the advertiser thaink that was a justified reaction to the kiss? Why did Snickers choose that ending? Why did a candy maker use the uidea at all?

See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 3.9 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.9

It would be easy to show editorial bias in an article like this, but none seemed apparent. I feel the author told the facts, did the research, and came to the conclusions in the article because he did his job.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
NT Rating: 4.3 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.8

Very well written and documented, but scary.

See Full Review » (7 answers)
NT Rating: 4.6 | See All NT Reviews »
Daniel reviewed this story - Oct 1, 2008
Daniel's Rating
4.3
See Full Review » (6 answers)
NT Rating: 4.3 | See All NT Reviews »
(Beta)

Levels & Stats

Member LevelHelp
3.1 avg.
3.1 avg.
Activity
2.3 avg.
Experience
1.0 avg.
Ratings
3.5 avg.
Transparency
1.0 avg.
Validation
4.0 avg.

StatsHelp
Reviews
13
Answers
70
Comments
0
Ratings Received
2
Number of Raters
1
Ratings Given
0

Member Ratings

Ratings received by Daniel (2) Help



Ratings given by Daniel Help

No ratings given yet.

Daniel's Widget

Add this widget to your site »