This article is so loaded with anonymous sources and unsubstantiated claims that it simply should not be trusted.

Nice story, and very well written. Only problem is I just don't buy it. This might pass the smell test for CNN and FOX, and might even get you a job there, but it don't pass my smell test.

Well, building nuke plants is very profitable, but let's look how interested Wall Street is in operating nuke plants. They aren't. No waste disposal site is even on the drawing board and the US is already non-compliant on it's promise to take spent fuel. Maine has no power from nukes but spends a fortune storing spent feul from an old plant that closed. No one wants to own a nuke plant. No one wants to live next to one. The expense of a nuke plant is 10 times the expense of wind or solar thermal plants on a per megawatt basis. Are you going to invest in owning one?

While the news and the story are important, the reporter lacks the imagination to appreciate the ramifications of the joint policy statement. The reporter prejudges the protesters to be misperceiving a danger, while not giving a voice to those who have a deep understanding of the serious negative consequences of a 2 lane internet.

This is a courageous and important investigative report, and very well done.

Good reporting on a topic that is important to follow.

It starts with a completely dishonest headline and continues to take sides throughout. No mention is made of the refusal of Israel to be inspected by IAEA, or the irony of Israel demanding others to do what it refuses to.

This is the real story. Stealing resources land and money is why mighty nations claim they are being attacked by impotent civilians.

This story has the same problem as storys about Muslims in the US. They are setups to justify attacks on weaker peoples who do not really make attacks on Goliaths, they are only blamed for them. Such attacks on Goliaths are usually elaborate false flag frame-ups conducted by the Goliaths themselves. Now, who do you think the Council on Foreign Relations is?

The main point of this commentary is a very good and important one. Some of the writers facts are wrong or missing. Anwar al-Awlaki inspired the Fort Hood shooter before moving to Yemen, and he is probably a US agent. Any where he goes can be bombed. Wanna bet we miss him again? Are there strip clubs in Yemen for him? I'll bet there's lots of patsys to train in Yemen. How do you decapitate an organization that doesn't exist? By decapitating one that does. I'm glad to hear it doesn't work, cause the mission is only to cause civil war in the region to keep China from building it's pipeline to Iran. You won't see this much depth in the Times, so this is a 'relatively' good article for them.