A well-written article that provides quotes that address the subject and make the author's point.

First-hand accounts tend to be colored by some personal bias, however they also give us a verifiable, truthful view once that bias is accounted for. This article provides much food for thought on how the 'wars' are conducted.

The story is a single, first-hand account of a lobbyist's view of the White House's new rules; I found it's value in it's perspective.

The initial written synopsis did not adequately reveal the merit of the hour-long program or accompanying analysis. I urge people to take the time to view the program and/or the analysis which show excellent sourcing, context, and fairness. It is unfortunate that the information they contain is not widely known by the American public.

The writing style was fun and engaging, however the author was slow to present facts and statistics and didn't solidly prove his thesis.

Article was informative, gave some background, and raises more questions. Another part of our system of checks and balances seems to have failed or been subverted. Coincidence?

The descriptive, first-hand accounts were gripping and the presentation of the psychologies at play were accurate.

The story presented Kucinich’s statements accurately as verified by watching the video. Another reviewer misinforms; Kucinich's stand is neither new nor prompted by polls. Relevant all along, the majority has finally discovered that his view was the truth. Kucinich continues to be ahead of the main stream, this time on action.

Through corroborating and disconfirming Obama’s book version of his youth, this article provides insight into the social-psychological make-up of the candidate.

This article provided no new insights but rather more right-wing spin. The article is full of false logic: the Republican penchant for straw men and red herrings. A leading question does not "dispense the core fallacy", and personally belittling the "chattering classes" proves that he has no valid arguments.