I think it was factual because it contained a lot of quotes and wasn't biased. It stated what happened without incorporating the author's own opinion.
See All NT Reviews » NT Rating: 4.1
To:
Separate email addresses with commas.
25 recipients max.
Note:
I think it was factual because it contained a lot of quotes and wasn't biased. It stated what happened without incorporating the author's own opinion.
I thought the author seemed biased against Obama. He didn't go into great detail on Obama's side or investigate why the president is being cautious. It was too one-sided.
It shows both sides of the story (good and bad) and uses professional and personal details to create a full story.