This article rose a few interesting points about society's codependent relatioship with science and technology. The author asks us to think of a world without DNA testing. Truth be told, such a world would have a lot more criminals on the streets and a lot more innocent people in jail. This piece gave me perspective on how something like DNA testing can completely change aspects of our society (criminology, paternity tests, etc.). Without DNA testing, who's to say we would be sure ... More »
This story addresses one method which people are using for energy in a world where energy has become a central concern. This technology, however, is far from having no repercussions. Hydro power creates loads of pollution and, in this case, has completely obliterated an entire ecosystem. This has repercussions not only for the wildlife there but for society at large. Canadians in the area are paying for the relatively higher costs of hydro power. It has been made abundantly clear ... More »
There is practically no real journalism in this. It's a debate that relies almost completely on persons and research from long ago. The only mentions of the modern world are the 2010 Gallup poll and a $27 million dollar Creation Museum in Kentucky.
This topic is obviously controversial and it is important to discuss it. This article could stand to use far more sources however as it relies primarily on opinion and work that was written long ago. Still, it is key for people to be aware of the overwhelming popularity of creationism.
This is an important development for some people so it helps to keep informed. It relies heavily on interviews and could stand to use more facts however.
The debate seemed to consider the con side much more heavily than the pro side. The article focused on the ecological impacts and the impressions of second generation Chinese who had feelings against shark fin soup. Most of the information came from regular people rather than biologists or ecologists.
Yes, it has a variety of sources and they seem fairly credible. It draws attention to an important issue for people who live in big cities.
Scientists conducted research to judge the impact on mice. This seems fairly valid. It has scientific credibility to be sure. More importantly however, it draws attention to the fact that our cities need stricter smog regulations if we are to avoid neurological damage.
Yes, this article is very well-sourced, factual, and germain to the current post-disaster effort in Japan.
This is very valuable news as the danger posed by the nuclear reactors is eminent. The people of Japan and those who would like to offer relief in the form of charity might find this piece to be quite helpful.
It is relatively good journalism. In the end, this journalist was simply observing a conversation between two people but, at least, these were two people who were very well-informed on the subject of nuclear power. Even still, they could not come to an agreement, which strikes me.
This is important as it helps people weigh in to the nuclear-power debate. It is an interesting topic as some countries have already decided to switch over while others continue to be reluctant. Afterall, we have come to appreciate the dangerous nature of nuclear energy. It is important that people stay informed on this, particularly with the energy crisis we have been having for so many years.





Despite advances in and continued education of science and technology, many people still believe certain ideas like "global warming is a myth" and "the world will end in 2012." Interestingly enough, we humans have connections between the reasoning and emotional parts of our brains. It is this that is responsible for that fiercely opinionated guy in your philosophy class and the homeless man screaming that the earth is going through a natural cycle. It allows cult members to think ... More »