This article does not hit any issues of importance in the 2008 Presidential campaign. Instead it repeats 'on-the-bus' style reporting about a candidate being late for events. It does at least mention that other candidates are often late, yet it paints it as a big issue for one particular candidate. Having worked on campaigns and been married to a campaign scheduler, I understand how many candidates are frequently late and how that has no relevance.

This is a particularly interesting story in that it explores whether or not a front page article in the New York Times counts as good journalism.

This is an extremely unfair article based on a lot of unfounded assumptions and promoting false views about politics in America. I, like others, have written extensively about why this such a poor article at sites like DailyKos, MyDD, Huffington post and others.

The article presents useful information about the advantages as well as the difficulties of using LEDs as a source of residential and business lighting as well as placing it in the broader context of energy usage.

The opinion piece presents a one-sided, but important exploration into the issue systemic efforts to suppress voter turnout.

The story presents a different perspective on how media could cover the 2008 Presidential Campaigns and what it means to participate in New Hampshire.

The brief article rightly points out significant problems with an Op-Ed in the Washington Times, but fails to provide much for context, new information, or much of anything else making it worth reading.

The article presents balanced well presented information about the two candidates in the French Presidential election. It would be better if more sources were provided, especially about influences on the candidates.

The article provides detailed analysis of who raised how much money in the south, possible causes and possible implications. It's biggest failure was how it did not talk about the issues, how they related to fundraising or possible support in the south.

The article takes an important look back at the coverage of the 'Mission Accomplished' speech of George Bush. It focuses on how one paper covered the story, and might have been better for a broader analysis. Nonetheless, it it great to see this backwards glance.

The story provides interesting information about new efforts to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, while looking at various sides of the problem.

This entry provides detailed information about Scott J. Bloch, head of the OSC, who is conducting an investigation into the Bush administration. The article has a clear bias, but raises important questions.

This could be a big important story, or it might be unimportant. How do we know? Well, if there was more information about The Office of Special Counsel, or about the head of the office, we might be able to tell. Yet the story doesn't provide details about the Bush appointee running the investigation.

Wow! An incredibly well written detailed report and analysis of what happens when one of the best musicians in the world plays at a Metro stop in Washington DC during rush hour

The article provides useful information about which advertisers have pulled their ads from Imus and encourages people to support these advertisers. It is a great start, although more information on the larger picture of media consolidation would have improved the story

Yepsen provides an in depth analysis of the the Federal Deficit and asks why we aren't hearing more about this on the campaign trail.

While this is yet another horse race oriented story, it does provide more information about the horse race than many such stories.

A generally well written article that provides a good review Sen. Edwards' campaign, the role his wife and her cancer plays in the race. It touches on experience campaigning and on the issues. While it seems to be an example of the baseline for good political journalism, given the rest of the horse race coverage out there, this article exceeds most of the other stories.

The article provides a good summary of the presidential fundraising in the first quarter with detailed discussions about what it means.

This article takes a critical and valuable look at how pack journalism seeks a narrative that is superficial and damages our democratic processes and what people are doing to address this.

The article presents detailed and interesting polling information for Iowa, contrasting voters in general with those likely to attend caucuses. Additional information about perceived candidate strength and electability complete the picture.

The article presents an interesting analysis of women's voting patterns, although it feels a little like the hit piece du jour by the journalist pack.

Rosen and Huffington's effort to bring new voices into the process of journalism covering the presidential elections looks very promising. Let's hope they can bring a real diversity of voices into the process.

The article doesn't provide anything particularly new, but it re-emphasizes that this is what Elizabeth Edwards wants

A good simple summary of the fundraising results for the 1st quarter

While the article doesn't provide great new insights or information, it does provide a good summary and context of what is so fascinating about how American views candidates and their spouses.

Barone presents an interesting analysis of what could happen in 2008. At times, the writing seems derogatory or condescending which takes away from an otherwise good article.

This is a well written and detailed analysis of an important issue.